MemeadorProduct design collective← AI visibility
Published baseline · run 2026-09-14

What AI says about our own product

Before we run this for anyone else, we publish the same test on ourselves. This is the unedited result: our product, Is This Page Good, across nine AI engines: which recognise it, which describe it wrongly, and which have never heard of it.

Why publish this: the honest first step is finding out you're not on the list. Most vendors show a dashboard and hide the misses. We'd rather show the misses — including the ones where an engine describes our product as something it isn't, which is as damaging as silence.

Method

18 prompts per engine: 15 unbranded (a buyer asking for a page-review or landing-page-audit tool, never naming us) and 3 branded (asking directly about Is This Page Good). Cold sessions, no account history, no search pre-seeding. Each answer recorded verbatim and scored for (a) whether we were named unbranded, (b) whether the description was correct.

The result

EngineNamed unbrandedBranded recallDescribed correctly?
Inkling (Thinking Machines)2 of 153 of 3No — called it “professional critiques, not automated scores”
Inkling-small03 of 3No — misread the mechanism as “peer feedback”
Gemini 3.6 Flash0NamedYes — accurate description
DeepSeek Chat00 of 3Never heard of it
GLM 5.3 Flash0Name only“No knowledge”
Nex 2.5 Pro0Name only“Can't verify”
Laguna S 2.1~11 of 15 (flagged)—Anomaly — pending re-probe

Baseline run 2026-09-14. Rows marked “flagged”/“anomaly” are excluded from the headline rate until re-probed.

What it says

We'll run the same test on you.

Three real buyer questions, the answers verbatim, and the competitor named instead of you. Free.

Get the free mirror test →